Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01039
Original file (PD 2012 01039.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX      CASE : PD -20 12 - 01039
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 201 4 0 3 2 1
Separation Date: 20020906


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a TSgt/E-6 (3P071, Security Forces) medically separated for o bstructive s leep a pnea (OSA). The CI was activated on 5 November 2001 and shortly thereafter was given a temporary P- 4 profile for difficulty breathing while sleeping. His condition and profile improved slightly then worsened at which point he was given the diagnosis of severe sleep apnea. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requireme nts of his Air Force Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The OSA , characterized as “severe sleep apnea” was identified by the MEB, along with a condition identified as status post thyroid cancer w/resection, with the recommendation of return to duty. A subsequent review by the Air Force Reserve Command, Aerospace Medicine Branch medically disqualified the CI and forwarded that recommendation to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). The No other conditions were identified by the MEB. The I nformal PEB adjudicated the sleep apnea as unfitting, rated 0%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “I was activated while still being treated for thyroid cancer. Possible exposure when deployed to Kuwait. I feel I should have been allowed to change jobs and finish out enlistment for retirement.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting OSA is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR) .


RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
Service IPEB – Dated
VA - based on Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Obstructive Sleep Apnea 6847 0% No VA Entry Service Treatment Record (STR)
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20031230 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])


ANALYSIS SUMMARY : The Board acknowledges that the PEB adjudication and STR’s for the CI’s OSA w ere referenced, but not available in the evidence before it; and, could not be located after the appropriate inquiries. Numerous attempts at obtaining the relevant documentation would likely be futile and introduce additional delay in processing the case. The missing evidence will be referenced below in relevant context. Additionally, The Board acknowledges the CI’s assertions that “I feel I should have been allowed to change jobs and finish out enlistment for retirement.” It is noted for the record that the Board has no jurisdiction to investigate or render opinions in reference to such allegations. These issues may be addressed by the BCMR and/or the United States judiciary system.


OSA Condition . In August 2001 , t he CI presented with symptoms of snoring, sleep apnea and excessive daytime somnolence. The CI was activated on 5 November 2001 and was placed on a P-3 p rofile on 8 November 2001 for difficulty breathing while sleeping. The p rofile was reverted back to a P-2 p rofile after review on 9 November 2001 since his symptoms had not changed since early October 2001. A polysomnogram (sleep study) was completed on 11   January 2002 which revealed severe OSA and the examiner recommended a trial of continuous positive airway pressure ( CPAP ) during a repeat overnight polysomnography. Repeat sleep testing with CPAP demonstrated an inadequate study as the CI was unable to tolerate the CPAP mask. A CPAP machine was ordered and the examiner changed the profile to a P-4 p rofile . It is unclear if the CPA P resulted in any improvement of the CI’s symptoms or if he actually used it as directed. The examiner opined that the OSA would require lifetime follow - up and recommended that the CI be relieved from active duty. The MEB n arrative summary exam documented that the CI required the use of a CPAP machine while sleeping and this made him non-deployable ; however , he had been able to perform all of his duties without restriction because he was able to go home to sleep and use his CPAP machine. The initial c ommander’s s tatement indicated that the CI’s unit was required to deploy every year as part of the field training; however , the CI was able to fill one of the peacetime tasked positions . The second c ommander’s statement noted that the CI’s profile specified no duty away from home station and that he had an oxygen mask that he had to wear while sleeping.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. There is no evidence of a PEB document for review in this case; however , the Board was able to confirm that the CI was separated for OSA and received se verance pay. There was no VA examination for severe OSA. The CI was diagnosed with severe OSA and required a CPAP machine at night for sleeping. He was profiled for the OSA and was restricted to no duty away from the home station. Although he was able to perform peacetime duties at his home station, the use of a CPAP machine would make him non-deployable. Contemporary PEBs across all s ervices no longer consider OSA to be unfitting solely on this basis, but the Board, by legal opinion and firm precedent, does not make contrary recommendations to a PEB determination that a condition was unfitting. VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities ( VASRD ) §4.97 mandates a minimum rating of 50% under 6847 for OSA requiring a breathing assistance device. In consideration of this evidence, and IAW DODI 6040.44, the Board must recommend a separation rating of 50% for the OSA condition. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 50% for the m oderate to s evere OSA r equiring n ightly u se of CPAP condition.


 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board surmised that the PEB relied on non-VASRD guidelines for rating the OSA condition and the condition was adjudicated independently of those guidelines by the Board. In the matter of the OSA condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 50%, coded 6847 IAW VASRD §4.97. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
O bstructive S leep A pnea 6847 5 0%
COMBINED 5 0%
invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 120612 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record




XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
PDBR PD-2012-01039



MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
         Having received and considered the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review and under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1554a (122 Stat. 466) and Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 (70A Stat. 116) it is directed that:
         The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Fo rce relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXX , be corrected to show that:

                   a. The diagnosis in his finding of unfitness for Obstructive Sleep Apnea, VASRD code 6847, was rated at 50% rather than 0%.

                  b. He was not discharged on 10 September 2002 with entitlement to disability severance pay; rather, on that date, he was released from active duty and on 11 September 2002 his name was placed on the Permanent Disability Retired List.

                   c. He married on 21 December 2012, and on 22 December 2012, he elected spouse-only Survivor Benefit Plan coverage based on full retired pay for his current spouse, XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.




XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02360

    Original file (PD-2013-02360.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The examiner opined that the CI’s condition was stable and his functional status depended on his getting a restful night’s sleep using the CPAP or Bi-PAP machine which was variable.The second commander’s statementdocumented that the CI’s medical condition prevented him from engaging in both soldering and MOS related tasks as he was unable to sleep without a CPAP or BI-PAP device by his side and his medical condition adversely impacted his unit’s readiness. RECOMMENDATION : The Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00905

    Original file (PD2012 00905.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Separation Date: 20060420 The CI continued to require CPAP for the severe OSA. Providing orders showing that the individual was retired with permanent disability effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01581

    Original file (PD-2013-01581.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The examiner noted some mild swelling and minimal tenderness below the patella with a “tendency to sublux medially” and the CI was given a soft knee brace with a patella cut–out.At the MEB examination on17 June 2004, 6...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02123

    Original file (PD-2013-02123.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “Obstructive Sleep Apnea with CPAP, mild impairment” as unfitting, rated 0%. Therefore, IAW VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD)§4.97 (schedule of ratings,respiratory system)and 6847 rating criteria, the disability due to the OSA condition meets the 50% rating specified as “requires use of breathing assistance device such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine, but does not meet the next higher...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00787

    Original file (PD 2012 00787.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Moderate To Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Requiring Nightly Use of CPAP Condition. In consideration of this evidence, and IAW DODI 6040.44, the Board must recommend a separation rating of 50% for the OSA condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: UNFITTING...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01483

    Original file (PD-2013-01483.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    CI CONTENTION : The CI simply stated “Sleep Apnea.” A 50% disability rating is warranted when the disability requires the use of a breathing assistance device such as a CPAP machine. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03859

    Original file (PD-2014-03859.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, the case file was reviewed regarding unfavorable diagnosis change, fitness determination, applicability of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.129, and rating of the MH condition adjudicated as not unfitting. Should the Board judge that any contested condition was most likely incompatible with the specific duty requirements; a disability rating IAW the VASRD and based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation, will be recommended.The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02822

    Original file (PD-2013-02822.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (42A20/Human Resources Sergeant) medically separated for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with nocturnal hypoxia, treated with bi-level positive airway pressure (BIPAP). BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00625

    Original file (PD2011-00625.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty member, SSG/E-5 (3P051/Security Forces Journeyman), medically separated from the Air Force after 10 years of service. VA treatment notes through 2008 show the CI continued to use his CPAP machine. Other PEB Conditions .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02062

    Original file (PD-2013-02062.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ratings for the unfitting OSA condition and the not unfitting bilateral knee, low back pain (LBP) and right acromioclavicular (AC) joint arthritis conditions are addressed below;no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. The orthopedic NARSUM notes the CI reported right shoulder pain for a year. Physical Disability Board of Review